<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Product Displacement &#8211; Part of a DINU</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rickliebling.com/2009/05/12/product-displacement-part-of-a-dinu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rickliebling.com/2009/05/12/product-displacement-part-of-a-dinu/</link>
	<description>Intelligence, Insight, Ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:23:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: New Advertising Trend: Ads within ads &#124; eyecube</title>
		<link>http://www.rickliebling.com/2009/05/12/product-displacement-part-of-a-dinu/comment-page-1/#comment-6802</link>
		<dc:creator>New Advertising Trend: Ads within ads &#124; eyecube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyecube.wordpress.com/?p=1448#comment-6802</guid>
		<description>[...] 19, 2009 By Rick   I&#8217;ve written a lot about advertising trends this year: fake infomercials, product displacement, product placement jokes, brands with authentic (and inauthentic) voices to name a few.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 19, 2009 By Rick   I&#8217;ve written a lot about advertising trends this year: fake infomercials, product displacement, product placement jokes, brands with authentic (and inauthentic) voices to name a few.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linkpile (via Delicious)</title>
		<link>http://www.rickliebling.com/2009/05/12/product-displacement-part-of-a-dinu/comment-page-1/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>Linkpile (via Delicious)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 12:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyecube.wordpress.com/?p=1448#comment-904</guid>
		<description>[...] Product Displacement, continued: Follow-up on Eyecube contains other interesting examples. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Product Displacement, continued: Follow-up on Eyecube contains other interesting examples. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SnuggieSightings.com</title>
		<link>http://www.rickliebling.com/2009/05/12/product-displacement-part-of-a-dinu/comment-page-1/#comment-903</link>
		<dc:creator>SnuggieSightings.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 06:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyecube.wordpress.com/?p=1448#comment-903</guid>
		<description>The debate rages on whether the product on 30 Rock was indeed a Slanket or a Snuggie. The Slanket usually has a tag on its sleeve, whereas the Snuggie has only recently begun adding a tag on theirs.

The 30 Rock blanket had no tag on its sleeve, and Tina Fey was rocking a Royal Blue one, which is the traditional (most common) color for Snuggie. So although the dialogue in the show credited the Slanket, 99.9% of the chatter on the blogosphere and on Twitter attributed this to being a Snuggie. So if Slanket did actually pay to have their product placed on 30 Rock, it was displaced by Snuggie.

This is the story of Slanket&#039;s life - displaced by Snuggie. It would be rather ironic if Slanket paid for this placement, only to accomplish yet more buzz for Snuggie...because that&#039;s exactly what happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The debate rages on whether the product on 30 Rock was indeed a Slanket or a Snuggie. The Slanket usually has a tag on its sleeve, whereas the Snuggie has only recently begun adding a tag on theirs.</p>
<p>The 30 Rock blanket had no tag on its sleeve, and Tina Fey was rocking a Royal Blue one, which is the traditional (most common) color for Snuggie. So although the dialogue in the show credited the Slanket, 99.9% of the chatter on the blogosphere and on Twitter attributed this to being a Snuggie. So if Slanket did actually pay to have their product placed on 30 Rock, it was displaced by Snuggie.</p>
<p>This is the story of Slanket&#8217;s life &#8211; displaced by Snuggie. It would be rather ironic if Slanket paid for this placement, only to accomplish yet more buzz for Snuggie&#8230;because that&#8217;s exactly what happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
