<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Advertising Trend: Ads within ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rickliebling.com/2009/11/19/new-advertising-trend-ads-within-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rickliebling.com/2009/11/19/new-advertising-trend-ads-within-ads/</link>
	<description>Intelligence, Insight, Ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:23:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.rickliebling.com/2009/11/19/new-advertising-trend-ads-within-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-6807</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickliebling.com/?p=2215#comment-6807</guid>
		<description>Good insight, thanks as always for your contributions Len.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good insight, thanks as always for your contributions Len.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Len Kendall</title>
		<link>http://www.rickliebling.com/2009/11/19/new-advertising-trend-ads-within-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-6805</link>
		<dc:creator>Len Kendall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickliebling.com/?p=2215#comment-6805</guid>
		<description>Rick,

Having worked in the media buying world for TV I can tell you this is very deliberate and the sharing of costs is carefully planned. Often, the vendor will act as mediator and help bridge the responsibility that all parties (agencies + brands) will bring to the table. 

There is definitely a financial advantage to this as you get 2 brands in the cost of one spot BUT the downfall is that the process is much harder because you&#039;re doubling the cooks in the kitchen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick,</p>
<p>Having worked in the media buying world for TV I can tell you this is very deliberate and the sharing of costs is carefully planned. Often, the vendor will act as mediator and help bridge the responsibility that all parties (agencies + brands) will bring to the table. </p>
<p>There is definitely a financial advantage to this as you get 2 brands in the cost of one spot BUT the downfall is that the process is much harder because you&#8217;re doubling the cooks in the kitchen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Liebling (eyecube) 's status on Thursday, 19-Nov-09 15:22:58 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.rickliebling.com/2009/11/19/new-advertising-trend-ads-within-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-6803</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Liebling (eyecube) 's status on Thursday, 19-Nov-09 15:22:58 UTC - Identi.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickliebling.com/?p=2215#comment-6803</guid>
		<description>[...]  http://www.rickliebling.com/2009/11/19/new-advertising-trend-ads-within-ads/        a few seconds ago  from web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  <a href="http://www.rickliebling.com/2009/11/19/new-advertising-trend-ads-within-ads/" rel="nofollow">http://www.rickliebling.com/2009/11/19/new-advertising-trend-ads-within-ads/</a>        a few seconds ago  from web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
